Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372226›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Comparison of Heart Autonomic Control between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients during Hemodialysis Sessions: A Bayesian Approach.

Natália de Jesus Oliveira, Alinne Alves Oliveira, Silvania Moraes Costa, Uanderson Silva Pirôpo, Mauro Fernandes Teles, Verônica Porto de Freitas, Dieslley Amorim de Souza, Rafael Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natália de Jesus OliveiraIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.
Alinne Alves OliveiraIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5616-2434
Silvania Moraes CostaIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.
Uanderson Silva PirôpoIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4476-4315
Mauro Fernandes TelesIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2688-3430
Verônica Porto de FreitasIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-1056
Dieslley Amorim de SouzaPostgraduate Program in Nursing & Health, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.
Rafael PereiraIntegrative Physiology Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequie 45210-506, BA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1800-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intradialytic hypotension is a common complication during hemodialysis sessions. The analysis of successive RR interval variability using nonlinear methods represents a promising tool for evaluating the cardiovascular response to acute volemic changes. Thus, the present study aims to compare the variability of successive RR intervals between hemodynamically stable (HS) and unstable (HU) patients during a hemodialysis session, through linear and nonlinear methods. Forty-six chronic kidney disease patients volunteered in this study. Successive RR intervals and blood pressures were recorded throughout the hemodialysis session. Hemodynamic stability was defined based on the delta of systolic blood pressure (higher SBP-lower SBP). The cutoff for hemodynamic stability was defined as 30 mm Hg, and patients were stratified as: HS ([n = 21]: ≤29.9 mm Hg) or HU ([n = 25]: ≥30 mm Hg). Linear methods (low-frequency [LFnu] and high-frequency [HFnu] spectra) and nonlinear methods (multiscale entropy [MSE] for Scales 1-20, and fuzzy entropy) were applied. The area under the MSE curve at Scales 1-5 (MSE

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseheart rate variabilityhemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID37372226
PMCPMC10296899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.