Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372224›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Autonomic Nervous System Influences on Cardiovascular Self-Organized Criticality.

Jacques-Olivier Fortrat, Guillaume Ravé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacques-Olivier FortratCHU Angers, Médecine Vasculaire, INSERM, CNRS, MITOVASC, Equipe CarMe, SFR ICAT, Université d'Angers, 49933 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9272-0157
Guillaume RavéToulouse Football Club, 1 Allée Gabriel Biénès, 31400 Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular self-organized criticality has recently been demonstrated. We studied a model of autonomic nervous system changes to better characterize heart rate variability self-organized criticality. The model included short and long-term autonomic changes associated with body position and physical training, respectively. Twelve professional soccer players took part in a 5-week training session divided into "Warm-up", "Intensive", and "Tapering" periods. A stand test was carried out at the beginning and end of each period. Heart rate variability was recorded beat by beat (Polar Team 2). Bradycardias, defined as successive heart rates with a decreasing value, were counted according to their length in number of heartbeat intervals. We checked whether bradycardias were distributed according to Zipf's law, a feature of self-organized criticality. Zipf's law draws a straight line when the rank of occurrence is plotted against the frequency of occurrence in a log-log graph. Bradycardias were distributed according to Zipf's law, regardless of body position or training. Bradycardias were much longer in the standing position than the supine position and Zipf's law was broken after a delay of four heartbeat intervals. Zipf's law could also be broken in some subjects with curved long bradycardia distributions by training. Zipf's law confirms the self-organized nature of heart rate variability and is strongly linked to autonomic standing adjustment. However, Zipf's law could be broken, the significance of which remains unclear.

Indexed as

autonomic nervous systembaroreflexblood pressure regulationcardiovascular dynamicsfractalheart rate variabilityhomeostasisself-organized criticalitysoccerZipf’s law

Identifiers

PMID37372224
PMCPMC10297491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.