Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372211›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Variation of the Algorithm to Achieve the Maximum Entropy for Belief Functions.

Joaquín Abellán, Alejandro Pérez-Lara, Serafín Moral-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joaquín AbellánDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9018-5165
Alejandro Pérez-LaraDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0009-0006-3040-9829
Serafín Moral-GarcíaDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence theory (TE), based on imprecise probabilities, is often more appropriate than the classical theory of probability (PT) to apply in situations with inaccurate or incomplete information. The quantification of the information that a piece of evidence involves is a key issue in TE. Shannon's entropy is an excellent measure in the PT for such purposes, being easy to calculate and fulfilling a wide set of properties that make it axiomatically the best one in PT. In TE, a similar role is played by the maximum of entropy (ME), verifying a similar set of properties. The ME is the unique measure in TE that has such axiomatic behavior. The problem of the ME in TE is its complex computational calculus, which makes its use problematic in some situations. There exists only one algorithm for the calculus of the ME in TE with a high computational cost, and this problem has been the principal drawback found with this measure. In this work, a variation of the original algorithm is presented. It is shown that with this modification, a reduction in the necessary steps to attain the ME can be obtained because, in each step, the power set of possibilities is reduced with respect to the original algorithm, which is the key point of the complexity found. This solution can provide greater applicability of this measure.

Indexed as

belief functionsmaximum of entropyuncertainty measures

Identifiers

PMID37372211
PMCPMC10297582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.