Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372186›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Outlier Detection with Reinforcement Learning for Costly to Verify Data.

Michiel Nijhuis, Iman van Lelyveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michiel NijhuisDe Nederlandsche Bank, 1000 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iman van LelyveldDe Nederlandsche Bank, 1000 AB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-5525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outliers are often present in data and many algorithms exist to find these outliers. Often we can verify these outliers to determine whether they are data errors or not. Unfortunately, checking such points is time-consuming and the underlying issues leading to the data error can change over time. An outlier detection approach should therefore be able to optimally use the knowledge gained from the verification of the ground truth and adjust accordingly. With advances in machine learning, this can be achieved by applying reinforcement learning on a statistical outlier detection approach. The approach uses an ensemble of proven outlier detection methods in combination with a reinforcement learning approach to tune the coefficients of the ensemble with every additional bit of data. The performance and the applicability of the reinforcement learning outlier detection approach are illustrated using granular data reported by Dutch insurers and pension funds under the Solvency II and FTK frameworks. The application shows that outliers can be identified by the ensemble learner. Moreover, applying the reinforcement learner on top of the ensemble model can further improve the results by optimising the coefficients of the ensemble learner.

Indexed as

algorithm designanomaly detectionoutlier detectionoutlier ensemblesreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID37372186
PMCPMC10296860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.