ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Identifying Cancer Driver Pathways Based on the Mouth Brooding Fish Algorithm.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the driver genes of cancer progression is of great significance in improving our understanding of the causes of cancer and promoting the development of personalized treatment. In this paper, we identify the driver genes at the pathway level via an existing intelligent optimization algorithm, named the Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) algorithm. Many methods based on the maximum weight submatrix model to identify driver pathways attach equal importance to coverage and exclusivity and assign them equal weight, but those methods ignore the impact of mutational heterogeneity. Here, we use principal component analysis (PCA) to incorporate covariate data to reduce the complexity of the algorithm and construct a maximum weight submatrix model considering different weights of coverage and exclusivity. Using this strategy, the unfavorable effect of mutational heterogeneity is overcome to some extent. Data involving lung adenocarcinoma and glioblastoma multiforme were tested with this method and the results compared with the MDPFinder, Dendrix, and Mutex methods. When the driver pathway size was 10, the recognition accuracy of the MBF method reached 80% in both datasets, and the weight values of the submatrix were 1.7 and 1.89, respectively, which are better than those of the compared methods. At the same time, in the signal pathway enrichment analysis, the important role of the driver genes identified by our MBF method in the cancer signaling pathway is revealed, and the validity of these driver genes is demonstrated from the perspective of their biological effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.