Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372174›Full record

ReviewBiology2023

Rosa Carotenuto, Maria Michela Pallotta, Margherita Tussellino, Chiara Fogliano

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of Glucose Metabolism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Erbium and Gadolinium onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mesenchymal stromal cell isolation from pond slider (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  10. Systematic review:Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Adverse Effect of Metallic Gold and Silver Nanoparticles onNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosa CarotenutoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-9657
Maria Michela PallottaInstitute for Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7731-8621
Margherita TussellinoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Chiara FoglianoDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0868-2520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro systems have been mainly promoted by authorities to sustain research by following the 3Rs principle, but continuously increasing amounts of evidence point out that in vivo experimentation is also of extreme relevance.

Indexed as

biological mechanismsmodel organismXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID37372174
PMCPMC10295250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.