Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371717›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Sex Differences in the Anti-Hypertensive Effect of Calcium-Channel Blockers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Eveline M van Luik, Esmée W P Vaes, Maud A M Vesseur, Nick Wilmes, Daniek A M Meijs, Sophie A J S Laven, Zenab Mohseni-Alsalhi, Sander de Haas, Marc E A Spaanderman, Chahinda Ghossein-Doha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The formation of KCommunications biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eveline M van LuikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8311-514X
Esmée W P VaesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-4415
Maud A M VesseurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-9620
Nick WilmesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7231-8654
Daniek A M MeijsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sophie A J S LavenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-4651
Zenab Mohseni-AlsalhiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7706-2478
Sander de HaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marc E A SpaandermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Chahinda Ghossein-DohaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the number one cause of death worldwide, with hypertension as the leading risk factor for both sexes. As sex may affect responsiveness to antihypertensive compounds, guidelines for CVD prevention might necessitate divergence between females and males. To this end, we studied the effectiveness of calcium channel blockers (CCB) on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and cardiac function between sexes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies on CCB from inception to May 2020. Studies had to present both baseline and follow-up measurements of the outcome variables of interest and present data in a sex-stratified manner. Mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model. In total, 38 studies with 8202 participants were used for this review. In females as compared to males, systolic BP decreased by -27.6 mmHg (95%CI -36.4; -18.8) (-17.1% (95%CI -22.5;-11.6)) versus -14.4 mmHg (95%CI -19.0; -9.9) (-9.8% (95%CI -12.9;-6.7)) (between-sex difference

Indexed as

calcium-channel blockerscardiovascular diseasehypertensionmeta-analysissex differencessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37371717
PMCPMC10296139
OpenAlexW4379958394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.