Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371645›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Behavior Therapy for Tics: A Perception-Action Integration Approach.

Julia Friedrich, Tina Rawish, Annet Bluschke, Christian Frings, Christian Beste, Alexander Münchau

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Advances in the application of comprehensive behavioral intervention in tic disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia FriedrichInstitute of Systems Motor Science, Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Tina RawishInstitute of Systems Motor Science, Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Annet BluschkeCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Christian FringsDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Trier, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Christian BesteCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Alexander MünchauInstitute of Systems Motor Science, Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM), University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
University of Lübeck · DEShandong Normal University · CNTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversität Trier · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR 2698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

European clinical guidelines recommend the use of Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) and Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) as first-line treatments for tic disorders. Although ongoing efforts in research are being made to understand the mechanisms underlying these behavioral approaches, as of yet, the neurophysiological mechanisms behind behavioral interventions are poorly understood. However, this is essential to tailor interventions to individual patients in order to increase compliance and efficacy. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC) and its derivative BRAC (Binding and Retrieval in Action Control) provide a theoretical framework to investigate cognitive and neural processes in the context of tic disorders. In this context, tics are conceptualized as a phenomenon of enhanced perception-action binding, with premonitory urges constituting the perceptual and the motor or vocal expression constituting the action part of an event file. Based on this, CBIT is assumed to strongly affect stimulus-response binding in the context of response selection, whereas the effects of ERP presumably unfold during stimulus-response binding in the response inhibition context. Further studies are needed to clarify the neurophysiological processes underlying behavioral interventions to enable the individualization and further development of therapeutic approaches for tic disorders.

Indexed as

binding and retrieval in action controlBRACCBITERPGilles de la Tourette syndromeHRTTECtheory of event codingtics

Identifiers

PMID37371645
PMCPMC10295834
OpenAlexW4378527801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.