ArticleBiomedicines2023
Methodological Appraisal of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Geographic Atrophy.
Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complement Inhibition in Geographic Atrophy: Clinical Evidence for Pegcetacoplan and Avacincaptad Pegol.Cureus · 2026Review
- Repurposing Dimethyl Fumarate Targeting Nrf2 to Slow Down the Growth of Areas of Geographic Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Myeloid lineage C3 induces reactive gliosis and neuronal stress during CNS inflammation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Complement Inhibitors for Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration-A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Mimickers of anterior uveitis, scleritis and misdiagnoses- tips and tricks for the cornea specialist.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2024Review
- Advanced Research in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Special Issue.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in Imaging Macular Atrophy for Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration is a common cause of blindness worldwide. Given the recent approval of the first therapy for GA, pegcetacoplan, we critically appraise methodological aspects of the phase 3 clinical trials published so far in this disease in relation to their design, analysis and interpretation. We reviewed some of the key attributes of all phase 3 clinical trials in GA available in the main public registry of clinical trials as of 20 May 2023. The topics discussed included types of endpoints, eligibility criteria,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.