Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371625›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Conservative Treatment of Dental Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Scoping Review.

Assunta Patano, Giuseppina Malcangi, Matteo De Santis, Roberta Morolla, Vito Settanni, Fabio Piras, Alessio Danilo Inchingolo, Antonio Mancini, Francesco Inchingolo, Gianna Dipalma and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Assunta PatanoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7395-3126
Giuseppina MalcangiDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-7506
Matteo De SantisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Roberta MorollaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Vito SettanniDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-3455
Fabio PirasDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0765-7710
Alessio Danilo InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-1039
Antonio ManciniDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-4086
Francesco InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-5883
Gianna DipalmaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-8987
Angelo Michele InchingoloDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-6337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review aims to evaluate methods of conservative reconstruction of dental enamel lesions resulting from abrasions and evaluate the effect of diode laser in reducing the symptoms of tooth sensitivity. The cementoenamel junction is more prone to substance loss because the enamel thickness is substantially decreased, resulting in a much weaker enamel-dentin bond.

methodsDental abrasion was examined in the mechanical cause alone. Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were used to discover publications that matched our topic from 1 January 2018 to 20 March 2023. A comparison of various non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) restoration treatments was generated mostly by mechanical considerations.

resultsA final number of 11 clinical trials and randomized controlled trials were included in the review for qualitative analysis. Composite resins performed well in clinical trials for the restoration of NCCLs.

conclusionsComposite, in its different forms of filling and consistency, preceded by the use of adhesives, is an efficient and effective material for the treatment of NCCLs. Diode laser use prior to NCCL restoration of teeth does not diminish restoration retention rate, may lessen hypersensitivity, and may affect restoration success.

Indexed as

composite restorationconservativeenamel abrasionnon-carious cervical lesionsRCTresin-modified glass-ionomer cementssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37371625
PMCPMC10295606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.