Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371617›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Relationship between Abnormal Placenta and Obstetric Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.

Shinya Matsuzaki, Yutaka Ueda, Satoko Matsuzaki, Hitomi Sakaguchi, Mamoru Kakuda, Misooja Lee, Yuki Takemoto, Harue Hayashida, Michihide Maeda, Reisa Kakubari and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Succenturiate Placental Lobe Abruption.International journal of women's health · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shinya MatsuzakiDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-9994
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-6379
Satoko MatsuzakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka 558-8558, Japan.
Hitomi SakaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Mamoru KakudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Misooja LeeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka 589-8511, Japan.
Yuki TakemotoDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Harue HayashidaDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Michihide MaedaDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8698-8520
Reisa KakubariDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Tsuyoshi HisaDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Seiji MabuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Shoji KamiuraDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-8891
Osaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JPKindai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta has several crucial physiological functions that help maintain a normal pregnancy. Although approximately 2-4% of pregnancies are complicated by abnormal placentas, obstetric outcomes remain understudied. This study aimed to determine the outcomes and prevalence of patients with abnormal placentas by conducting a systematic review of 48 studies published between 1974 and 2022. The cumulative prevalence of circumvallate placenta, succenturiate placenta, multilobed placenta, and placenta membranacea were 1.2%, 1.0%, 0.2%, and 0.004%, respectively. Pregnancies with a circumvallate placenta were associated with an increased rate of emergent cesarean delivery, preterm birth (PTB), and placental abruption compared to those without a circumvallate placenta. The succenturiate lobe of the placenta was associated with a higher rate of emergent cesarean delivery, whereas comparative results were observed in terms of PTB, placental abruption, and placenta previa in comparison to those without a succenturiate lobe of the placenta. A comparator study that examined the outcomes of multilobed placentas found that this data is usually unavailable. Patient-level analysis (

Indexed as

abnormal placentabilobed placentacircumvallate placentamultilobed placentaplacenta membranaceasuccenturiate lobesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37371617
PMCPMC10295197
OpenAlexW4378226865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.