ArticleBiomolecules2023
Dynamics of Urinary Extracellular DNA in Urosepsis.
Article in Biomolecules, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined predictive accuracy of inflammatory and hematologic indicators for urinary tract-related bloodstream infection.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Predictive value of procalcitonin for the therapeutic response of patients with uroseptic shock: a retrospective case-control study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular DNA (ecDNA) is a promising candidate marker for the early diagnosis and monitoring of urinary tract infections (UTIs). The aim of our study is to describe the dynamics of ecDNA in the plasma and urine of patients with urosepsis as well as in a mouse model of UTI. Samples of blood and urine were collected from adult patients with UTIs and obstructive uropathy (n = 36) during the first 3 days at the hospital and during a follow-up. Bacterial burden and urinary ecDNA were evaluated in a mouse UTI model (n = 26) at baseline; 24, 48, and 72 h after UTI induction; and 7 days after UTI induction. The plasma ecDNA did not change during urosepsis, but the plasma DNase activity increased significantly at the follow-up. The urinary ecDNA decreased significantly during hospitalization and remained low until the follow-up (90% lower vs. admission). No change was seen in the urinary DNase activity. C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin are positively correlated with plasma and urinary ecDNA. A UTI caused sepsis in 23% of mice. The urinary ecDNA decreased by three-fold and remained low until day 7 post-infection. Urinary bacterial burden is correlated with urinary ecDNA. Urinary ecDNA is a potential non-invasive marker for monitoring the effects of treatment during urosepsis and is related to UTI progression in the experimental animal model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.