Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371447›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Evaluation of Subtle Auditory Impairments with Multiple Audiological Assessments in Normal Hearing Workers Exposed to Occupational Noise.

Alessandra Giannella Samelli, Clayton Henrique Rocha, Mariana Keiko Kamita, Maria Elisa Pereira Lopes, Camila Quintiliano Andrade, Carla Gentile Matas

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra Giannella SamelliDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-8942
Clayton Henrique RochaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-323X
Mariana Keiko KamitaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.
Maria Elisa Pereira LopesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.
Camila Quintiliano AndradeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.
Carla Gentile MatasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, and Occupational Therapy, Medical School (FMUSP), University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05360-160, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/25046-4National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 301068/2018-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies involving guinea pigs have shown that noise can damage the synapses between the inner hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, even with normal hearing thresholds-which makes it important to investigate this kind of impairment in humans. The aim was to investigate, with multiple audiological assessments, the auditory function of normal hearing workers exposed to occupational noise. Altogether, 60 workers were assessed (30 in the noise-exposure group [NEG], who were exposed to occupational noise, and 30 in the control group [CG], who were not exposed to occupational noise); the workers were matched according to age. The following procedures were used: complete audiological assessment; speech recognition threshold in noise (SRTN); speech in noise (SN) in an acoustic field; gaps-in-noise (GIN); transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and inhibitory effect of the efferent auditory pathway; auditory brainstem response (ABR); and long-latency auditory evoked potentials (LLAEP). No significant difference was found between the groups in SRTN. In SN, the NEG performed worse than the CG in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) 0 (

Indexed as

auditory perceptual disorderscochleahearing testsnoiseoccupational

Identifiers

PMID37371447
PMCPMC10296706
OpenAlexW4381432546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.