ArticleBrain sciences2023
Differential Roles of Neural Integrity, Physical Activity and Depression in Frailty: Sex-Related Differences.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel ecological approach to assess theory of Mind and social norm understanding for social cognition phenotyping in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Frailty and Associated Sociodemographic, Biomedical, and Biochemical Factors Amongst Participants Residing in Limpopo Province, South Africa.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Social isolation in relation to the incidence and dynamic progression of frailty in the oldest old: a trajectory analysis of a nationwide cohort.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The key role of depression and supramarginal gyrus in frailty: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The frailty sex paradox has recently gained attention. At all ages, females are more likely to be frail and show a more severe phenotype but have a higher survival rate compared to males. The main aim was to test sex-specific differences in frailty syndrome using a multimodal evaluation from clinical and imaging data to deepen the understanding of different underlying mechanisms involved in the two sexes, and thus understand the association with different risk factors. Ninety-six community-dwelling older adults were characterized by clinical underpinnings (Fried's frailty indicators: comorbidity, depression, global cognitive level, physical activity, autonomy), and neural integrity (T1-weighted brain 3T MRI). The frailty × sex interaction in clinical and neural profiles was tested. Additionally, frailty risk factors were identified in the two sexes separately. Results showed that fragility was associated with an increment of depressive symptomatology in females, while a decrement in physical activity was observed already in the pre-frail stage in males. Finally, different risk factors were observed in the two groups: significant frailty predictors were neural integrity and physical activity in males, and age and depression in females. These data support the starting hypothesis of at least partially different mechanisms involved in the frailty phenotype between men and women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.