Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371415›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Brentano Illusion Test in the Detection of Visual Hemi-Field Deficits in Patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect.

Maria De Luca, Matteo Baroncini, Alessandro Matano, Concetta Di Lorenzo, Luisa Magnotti, Susanna Lucatello, Martina Mulas, Virginia Pollarini, Maria Paola Ciurli, Davide Nardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria De LucaIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-3772
Matteo BaronciniIRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, 56128 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3280-3601
Alessandro MatanoIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Concetta Di LorenzoIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-2614-7533
Luisa MagnottiIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Susanna LucatelloIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-8810
Martina MulasFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-3827-4150
Virginia PollariniFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-2259-2819
Maria Paola CiurliIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-9569
Davide NardoDepartment of Education, University of Roma Tre, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8158-5738
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione Stella Maris · ITRoma Tre University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke survivors with right-brain damage (RBD) often present with attentional deficits such as left unilateral spatial neglect. Some patients also present with contralesional visual hemi-field deficits. A late detection of visual hemi-field deficits (VHFD) contributes to hampering neurorehabilitation and functional outcome of patients with neglect. The Brentano Illusion Test (BRIT) may be used for an early detection of VHFD during the neuropsychological assessment. In the present study, we determined the sensitivity and specificity of the BRIT for screening VHFD in patients with neglect. Sixty-four consecutive RBD patients were examined. Forty-five presented with neglect. Of these, 23 presented with VHFD (hemianopia or quadrantanopia) as detected by the Humphrey automated static visual field testing (reference standard). Consecutive patients also included 19 participants without neglect, who did not have any VHFD. The sensitivity and specificity of the BRIT for neglect patients were 78.3% (95% CI: 61.4-95.1) and 90.9 (95% CI: 78.9-100.0), respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 89.6% (95% CI: 76.4-100.0); negative predictive value (NPV) 80.7% (95% CI: 65.2-96.2). No false positives in the group without neglect were identified. We conclude that the BRIT is an effective tool for clinical neuropsychologists to screen for possible VHFD in neglect patients during the neuropsychological assessment, allowing the refinement of the clinical picture in the neuropsychological report. An early detection of VHFD also allows referring the patient to standard diagnostics for a formal visual field examination, right from the first neuropsychological assessment.

Indexed as

Brentano Illusion Testhemianopiascreeningsensitivityspecificityunilateral spatial neglect

Identifiers

PMID37371415
PMCPMC10296626
OpenAlexW4380089075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.