Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371390›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Predicting Histopathological Grading of Adult Gliomas Based On Preoperative Conventional Multimodal MRI Radiomics: A Machine Learning Model.

Peng Du, Xiao Liu, Xuefan Wu, Jiawei Chen, Aihong Cao, Daoying Geng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng DuDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xiao LiuSchool of Computer and Information Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Xuefan WuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Gamma Hospital, Shanghai 200040, China.
Jiawei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Aihong CaoDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China.
Daoying GengDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3585-6883
Fudan University · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNBeijing Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou), Fudan University 21618Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22TS1400900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe accurate preoperative histopathological grade diagnosis of adult gliomas is of great significance for the formulation of a surgical plan and the implementation of a subsequent treatment. The aim of this study is to establish a predictive model for classifying adult gliomas into grades 2-4 based on preoperative conventional multimodal MRI radiomics. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with pathologically confirmed gliomas at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, between February 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Two regions of interest (ROIs), called the maximum anomaly region (ROI1) and the tumor region (ROI2), were delineated on the patients' preoperative MRIs utilizing the tool ITK-SNAP, and Pyradiomics 3.0 was applied to execute feature extraction. Feature selection was performed utilizing a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) filter. Six classifiers, including Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB), random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) with a linear kernel, adaptive boosting (AB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were used to establish predictive models, and the predictive performance of the six classifiers was evaluated through five-fold cross-validation. The performance of the predictive models was evaluated using the AUC and other metrics. After that, the model with the best predictive performance was tested using the external data from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA).

resultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 240 patients with gliomas were identified for inclusion in the study, including 106 grade 2, 68 grade 3, and 66 grade 4 gliomas. A total of 150 features was selected, and the MLP classifier had the best predictive performance among the six classifiers based on T2-FLAIR (mean AUC of 0.80 ± 0.07). The SVM classifier had the best predictive performance among the six classifiers based on DWI (mean AUC of 0.84 ± 0.05); the SVM classifier had the best predictive performance among the six classifiers based on CE-T1WI (mean AUC of 0.85 ± 0.06). Among the six classifiers, based on ROI1, the MLP classifier had the best prediction performance (mean AUC of 0.78 ± 0.07); among the six classifiers, based on ROI2, the SVM classifier had the best prediction performance (mean AUC of 0.82 ± 0.07). Among the six classifiers, based on the multimodal MRI of all the ROIs, the SVM classifier had the best prediction performance (average AUC of 0.85 ± 0.04). The SVM classifier, based on the multimodal MRI of all the ROIs, achieved an AUC of 0.81 using the external data from TCIA.

conclusionsThe prediction model, based on preoperative conventional multimodal MRI radiomics, established in this study can conveniently, accurately, and noninvasively classify adult gliomas into grades 2-4, providing certain assistance for the precise diagnosis and treatment of patients and optimizing their clinical management.

Indexed as

adult gliomahistopathological gradingmachine learningMRImultimodalradiomics

Identifiers

PMID37371390
PMCPMC10296016
OpenAlexW4379517821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.