Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371196›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effectiveness of Psychomotor Therapy among Children with Graphomotor Impairment with and without DCD-Diagnosis.

Sibylle Hurschler Lichtsteiner, Melanie Nideröst, Carlo Di Brina, Christian Marquardt, Stefanie Wyss, Alois Buholzer, Werner Wicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sibylle Hurschler LichtsteinerLanguages Research Group, University of Teacher Education Lucerne, CH-6003 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-7027
Melanie NideröstInstitute for Educational Support for Behaviour, Social-Emotional, and Psychomotor Development, University of Teacher Education in Special Needs Zurich, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlo Di BrinaDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, I-00185 Rome, Italy.
Christian MarquardtScience&Motion GmbH, D-81547 Munich, Germany.
Stefanie WyssLanguages Research Group, University of Teacher Education Lucerne, CH-6003 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6580-7815
Alois BuholzerInstitute for Diversity in Education, University of Teacher Education Lucerne, CH-6003 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Werner WickiLanguages Research Group, University of Teacher Education Lucerne, CH-6003 Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-023X
University of Teacher Education Lucerne · CHSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Teacher Education in Special Needs · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 100019_185467/1+2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Switzerland, psychomotor therapy (PMT) is a standard treatment for children with graphomotor impairments, but scientific evidence of its effectiveness is rare. To investigate the effectiveness of PMT, we conducted a randomised field trial (RFT). The sample consisted of 121 first and second graders with graphomotor impairments, some of whom met the criteria of developmental coordination disorder, while the remaining suffered from developmental dysgraphia. The treatments lasted over 5 months. Handwriting fluency and consistency were measured five times on a digitising tablet. All participating children completed a self-concept interview, and a standardised fine motor performance test twice. Psychomotor therapy significantly improved the fine motor skills of the therapy group compared to those of the waiting group. However, there was no evidence that the treated children improved more than the waiting children in terms of their graphomotor skills such as frequency, automaticity, and consistency of forming letters. Finally, the children of the therapy group showed partial improvements in their handwriting self-concept, while those of the waiting group children remained stable. This short-term RFT demonstrated the effectiveness of PMT in terms of fine motor skills and some aspects of the handwriting self-concept but showed no effects on handwriting fluency and consistency.

Indexed as

developmental coordination disorderdysgraphiaeffectiveness of psychomotor therapyhandwritingpsychomotor therapy

Identifiers

PMID37371196
PMCPMC10297145
OpenAlexW4378716674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.