Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371195›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Child Abuse, Misdiagnosed by an Expertise Center: Part I-Medico-Social Aspects.

Marianne Vlaming, Pieter J J Sauer, Emile P F Janssen, Peter J van Koppen, Cornelis M A Bruijninckx, Marga W M Akkerman-Zaalberg van Zelst, H A Martino Neumann, Martin J C van Gemert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne VlamingPrivate Practice, Criminal Psychology and Law, 6986 CL Angerlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-5030-1114
Pieter J J SauerDepartment of Pediatrics, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emile P F JanssenPrivate Practice, Rehabilitation Medicine & Consultancy, 6137 CL Sittard, The Netherlands.
Peter J van KoppenDepartment of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, VU University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis M A BruijninckxPrivate Practice, 2511 CG The Hague, The Netherlands.
Marga W M Akkerman-Zaalberg van ZelstInstituut Marga Akkerman, 2101 AD Heemstede, The Netherlands.
H A Martino NeumannZBC-Multicare, 1217 AB Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Martin J C van GemertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLZBC Multicare (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child abuse is a dangerous situation for an infant. Professionals need to weigh the risk of failing to act when children are seriously harmed against the serious harm done by carrying out safeguarding interventions. In severe cases, foster care might be advisable. The negative effects for the child's psychosocial development requires that such placement must be based on very solid evidence. Our aim is to identify why Dutch parents whose child may have a medical condition that could mimic symptoms of child abuse have a significant chance of being erroneously convicted and losing custody of their child. As a method, we describe and analyze the following case. An Armenian-Dutch newborn (uncomplicated term vaginal delivery), starting at two weeks after birth, developed small bruises on varying body locations. At two months, a Well-Baby Clinic physician referred the girl to a university hospital, mentioning that there were no reasons to suspect child abuse and that her Armenian grandmother easily bruised as well. However, before consultation by a pediatrician of the hospital-located Expertise Center for Child Abuse, the parents were suspected of child abuse. Based on the expertise center's protocols, skeletal X-rays were made, which showed three healed, asymptomatic rib fractures, while invalid statistics suggested, incorrectly, a 10-100 times more likely non-accidental than accidental cause of the symptoms (discussed in Part II of this series). The expertise enter physician ignored any argument that could show parental innocence, including the positive parent-child relationship reported by the Well-Baby Clinic and the general practitioner. The girl and her older brother were placed in a family foster home and then in a secret home. The case radically resolved when a large bruise also developed there, and an independent tissue disease specialist diagnosed a hereditary connective tissue disorder in the mother, implying that the girl's bruises and rib fractures could well be disease-related. In conclusion, if child abuse is suspected, and foster care placement considered, the patient and the parents should be thoroughly investigated by an independent experienced pediatrician together with an experienced pediatric clinical psychologist or psychotherapist to produce an independent opinion. Children deserve this extra safeguard before being separated from their parents.

Indexed as

diagnostic errorDutch expertise center for child abusefoster care placementhypermobility-type Ehlers-Danlos-Syndrome (hEDS)infant bruises and rib fracturesmedical and social aspectsmisdiagnosed child abuse

Identifiers

PMID37371195
PMCPMC10297267
OpenAlexW4378714709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.