ArticleCells2023
The Prodigious Potential of mRNA Electrotransfer as a Substitute to Conventional DNA-Based Transient Transfection.
Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localized delivery of coding nucleic acids into adherent cells by in situ electroporation: integrated impedance-based monitoring allows for loss-of-function or gain-of-function screening.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Precise intracellular uptake and endosomal release of diverse functional mRNA payloads via glutathione-responsive nanogels.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- RNA Structure: Past, Future, and Gene Therapy Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Molecular mechanism of IKK catalytic dimer docking to NF-κB substrates.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transient transfection of foreign DNA is the most widely used laboratory technique to study gene function and product. However, the transfection efficiency depends on many parameters, including DNA quantity and quality, transfection methods and target cell lines. Here, we describe the considerable advantage of mRNA electroporation compared to conventional DNA-based systems. Indeed, our methodology offers extremely high transfection efficiency up to 98% regardless of the cell line tested. Protein expression takes place a few hours post-transfection and lasts over 72 h, but overall, the electrotransfer of mRNAs enables the monitoring of the level of protein expressed by simply modulating the amount of mRNAs used. As a result, we successfully conducted cell imaging by matching the levels of expressed V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.