Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37371006›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Artificial Intelligence for Automated DWI/FLAIR Mismatch Assessment on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Cecilie Mørck Offersen, Jens Sørensen, Kaining Sheng, Jonathan Frederik Carlsen, Annika Reynberg Langkilde, Akshay Pai, Thomas Clement Truelsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cecilie Mørck OffersenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5763-6892
Jens SørensenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0009-0669-1723
Kaining ShengDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-5821
Jonathan Frederik CarlsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6724-7281
Annika Reynberg LangkildeDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Akshay PaiDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas Clement TruelsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-7761
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-1688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted this Systematic Review to create an overview of the currently existing Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods for Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)/Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR)-mismatch assessment and to determine how well DWI/FLAIR mismatch algorithms perform compared to domain experts. We searched PubMed Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and IEEE Xplore literature databases for relevant studies published between 1 January 2017 and 20 November 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We assessed the included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Five studies fit the scope of this review. The area under the curve ranged from 0.74 to 0.90. The sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.70 to 0.85 and 0.74 to 0.84, respectively. Negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy ranged from 0.55 to 0.82, 0.74 to 0.91, and 0.73 to 0.83, respectively. In a binary classification of ±4.5 h from stroke onset, the surveyed AI methods performed equivalent to or even better than domain experts. However, using the relation between time since stroke onset (TSS) and increasing visibility of FLAIR hyperintensity lesions is not recommended for the determination of TSS within the first 4.5 h. An AI algorithm on DWI/FLAIR mismatch assessment focused on treatment eligibility, outcome prediction, and consideration of patient-specific data could potentially increase the proportion of stroke patients with unknown onset who could be treated with thrombolysis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningMR DWI/FLAIR mismatchwake-up stroke

Identifiers

PMID37371006
PMCPMC10297208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.