ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
In-Domain Transfer Learning Strategy for Tumor Detection on Brain MRI.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Modal Deep Learning with In-Domain Training and Attention for Infant Brain Myelination Prediction.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis and recurrence risk in early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma with fully automated MRI deep learning.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Enhancing COVID-19 classification of X-ray images with hybrid deep transfer learning models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Automated Rotator Cuff Tear Screening in Three Planes of Shoulder MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfer learning has gained importance in areas where there is a labeled data shortage. However, it is still controversial as to what extent natural image datasets as pre-training sources contribute scientifically to success in different fields, such as medical imaging. In this study, the effect of transfer learning for medical object detection was quantitatively compared using natural and medical image datasets. Within the scope of this study, transfer learning strategies based on five different weight initialization methods were discussed. A natural image dataset MS COCO and brain tumor dataset BraTS 2020 were used as the transfer learning source, and Gazi Brains 2020 was used for the target. Mask R-CNN was adopted as a deep learning architecture for its capability to effectively handle both object detection and segmentation tasks. The experimental results show that transfer learning from the medical image dataset was found to be 10% more successful and showed 24% better convergence performance than the MS COCO pre-trained model, although it contains fewer data. While the effect of data augmentation on the natural image pre-trained model was 5%, the same domain pre-trained model was measured as 2%. According to the most widely used object detection metric, transfer learning strategies using MS COCO weights and random weights showed the same object detection performance as data augmentation. The performance of the most effective strategies identified in the Mask R-CNN model was also tested with YOLOv8. Results showed that even if the amount of data is less than the natural dataset, in-domain transfer learning is more efficient than cross-domain transfer learning. Moreover, this study demonstrates the first use of the Gazi Brains 2020 dataset, which was generated to address the lack of labeled and qualified brain MRI data in the medical field for in-domain transfer learning. Thus, knowledge transfer was carried out from the deep neural network, which was trained with brain tumor data and tested on a different brain tumor dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.