ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Integrative Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests for Cardiovascular Outcome Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning Classification of Pediatric Health Status Based on Cardiorespiratory Signals with Causal and Information Domain Features Applied-An Exploratory Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Improving cardiovascular risk stratification through multivariate time-series analysis of cardiopulmonary exercise test data.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Integrative interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) may improve assessment of cardiovascular (CV) risk. Here, we identified patient phenogroups based on CPET summary metrics and evaluated their predictive value for CV events. We included 2280 patients with diverse CV risk who underwent maximal CPET by cycle ergometry. Key CPET indices and information on incident CV events (median follow-up time: 5.3 years) were derived. Next, we applied unsupervised clustering by Gaussian Mixture modeling to subdivide the cohort into four male and four female phenogroups solely based on differences in CPET metrics. Ten of 18 CPET metrics were used for clustering as eight were removed due to high collinearity. In males and females, the phenogroups differed significantly in age, BMI, blood pressure, disease prevalence, medication intake and spirometry. In males, phenogroups 3 and 4 presented a significantly higher risk for incident CV events than phenogroup 1 (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio: 1.51 and 2.19; p ≤ 0.048). In females, differences in the risk for future CV events between the phenogroups were not significant after adjustment for clinical covariables. Integrative CPET-based phenogrouping, thus, adequately stratified male patients according to CV risk. CPET phenomapping may facilitate comprehensive evaluation of CPET results and steer CV risk stratification and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.