Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370876›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Fusion of Graph and Tabular Deep Learning Models for Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease.

Patike Kiran Rao, Subarna Chatterjee, K Nagaraju, Surbhi B Khan, Ahlam Almusharraf, Abdullah I Alharbi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Geometric Deep Learning for Multimodal Data in CKD.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Patike Kiran RaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru 560054, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-4188
Subarna ChatterjeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, MS Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru 560054, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4062-0100
K NagarajuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing, Kurnool 518008, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-2563
Surbhi B KhanDepartment of Data Science, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3097-6568
Ahlam AlmusharrafDepartment of Business Administration, College of Business and Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-547X
Abdullah I AlharbiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia.
M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences · INIndian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad · INKing Abdulaziz University · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) represents a considerable global health challenge, emphasizing the need for precise and prompt prediction of disease progression to enable early intervention and enhance patient outcomes. As per this study, we introduce an innovative fusion deep learning model that combines a Graph Neural Network (GNN) and a tabular data model for predicting CKD progression by capitalizing on the strengths of both graph-structured and tabular data representations. The GNN model processes graph-structured data, uncovering intricate relationships between patients and their medical conditions, while the tabular data model adeptly manages patient-specific features within a conventional data format. An extensive comparison of the fusion model, GNN model, tabular data model, and a baseline model was conducted utilizing various evaluation metrics, encompassing accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The fusion model exhibited outstanding performance across all metrics, underlining its augmented capacity for predicting CKD progression. The GNN model's performance closely trailed the fusion model, accentuating the advantages of integrating graph-structured data into the prediction process. Hyperparameter optimization was performed using grid search, ensuring a fair comparison among the models. The fusion model displayed consistent performance across diverse data splits, demonstrating its adaptability to dataset variations and resilience against noise and outliers. In conclusion, the proposed fusion deep learning model, which amalgamates the capabilities of both the GNN model and the tabular data model, substantially surpasses the individual models and the baseline model in predicting CKD progression. This pioneering approach provides a more precise and dependable method for early detection and management of CKD, highlighting its potential to advance the domain of precision medicine and elevate patient care.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseCKDdeep learningGNNgraph neural network modelhealthcarepredictiontabular data model

Identifiers

PMID37370876
PMCPMC10297131
OpenAlexW4379517778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.