Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370808›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Model and Human-Machine Fusion for Accurate Grading of Renal Cell Carcinoma from Histopathology Slides.

Qingyuan Zheng, Rui Yang, Huazhen Xu, Junjie Fan, Panpan Jiao, Xinmiao Ni, Jingping Yuan, Lei Wang, Zhiyuan Chen, Xiuheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qingyuan ZhengDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-3857
Rui YangDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Huazhen XuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
Junjie FanUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Panpan JiaoDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Xinmiao NiDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Jingping YuanDepartment of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Zhiyuan ChenDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Xiuheng LiuDepartment of Urology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3882-2715

Funding

Hubei Province Central Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Project 2022BGE232Hubei Province Key Research and Development Project 2020BCB051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The Fuhrman grading (FG) system is widely used in the management of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, it is affected by observer variability and irreproducibility in clinical practice. We aimed to use a deep learning multi-class model called SSL-CLAM to assist in diagnosing the FG status of ccRCC patients using digitized whole slide images (WSIs). (2) Methods: We recruited 504 eligible ccRCC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort and obtained 708 hematoxylin and eosin-stained WSIs for the development and internal validation of the SSL-CLAM model. Additionally, we obtained 445 WSIs from 188 ccRCC eligible patients in the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) cohort as an independent external validation set. A human-machine fusion approach was used to validate the added value of the SSL-CLAM model for pathologists. (3) Results: The SSL-CLAM model successfully diagnosed the five FG statuses (Grade-0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) of ccRCC, and achieved AUCs of 0.917 and 0.887 on the internal and external validation sets, respectively, outperforming a junior pathologist. For the normal/tumor classification (Grade-0, Grade-1/2/3/4) task, the SSL-CLAM model yielded AUCs close to 1 on both the internal and external validation sets. The SSL-CLAM model achieved a better performance for the two-tiered FG (Grade-0, Grade-1/2, and Grade-3/4) task, with AUCs of 0.936 and 0.915 on the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The human-machine diagnostic performance was superior to that of the SSL-CLAM model, showing promising prospects. In addition, the high-attention regions of the SSL-CLAM model showed that with an increasing FG status, the cell nuclei in the tumor region become larger, with irregular contours and increased cellular pleomorphism. (4) Conclusions: Our findings support the feasibility of using deep learning and human-machine fusion methods for FG classification on WSIs from ccRCC patients, which may assist pathologists in making diagnostic decisions.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinomadeep learninghuman–machine fusiontumor gradingwhole slide image

Identifiers

PMID37370808
PMCPMC10296233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.