ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Exploring the Possibility of Measuring Vertebrae Bone Structure Metrics Using MDCT Images: An Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation Method.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bone structure metrics are vital for the evaluation of vertebral bone strength. However, the gold standard for measuring bone structure metrics, micro-Computed Tomography (micro-CT), cannot be used in vivo, which hinders the early diagnosis of fragility fractures. This paper used an unpaired image-to-image translation method to capture the mapping between clinical multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and micro-CT images and then generated micro-CT-like images to measure bone structure metrics. MDCT and micro-CT images were scanned from 75 human lumbar spine specimens and formed training and testing sets. The generator in the model focused on learning both the structure and detailed pattern of bone trabeculae and generating micro-CT-like images, and the discriminator determined whether the generated images were micro-CT images or not. Based on similarity metrics (i.e., SSIM and FID) and bone structure metrics (i.e., bone volume fraction, trabecular separation and trabecular thickness), a set of comparisons were performed. The results show that the proposed method can perform better in terms of both similarity metrics and bone structure metrics and the improvement is statistically significant. In particular, we compared the proposed method with the paired image-to-image method and analyzed the pros and cons of the method used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.