ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Physiological Noise Filtering in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Signals Using Wavelet Transform and Long-Short Term Memory Networks.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activated channels of functional near-infrared spectroscopy are typically identified using the desired hemodynamic response function (dHRF) generated by a trial period. However, this approach is not possible for an unknown trial period. In this paper, an innovative method not using the dHRF is proposed, which extracts fluctuating signals during the resting state using maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform, identifies low-frequency wavelets corresponding to physiological noise, trains them using long-short term memory networks, and predicts/subtracts them during the task session. The motivation for prediction is to maintain the phase information of physiological noise at the start time of a task, which is possible because the signal is extended from the resting state to the task session. This technique decomposes the resting state data into nine wavelets and uses the fifth to ninth wavelets for learning and prediction. In the eighth wavelet, the prediction error difference between the with and without dHRF from the 15-s prediction window appeared to be the largest. Considering the difficulty in removing physiological noise when the activation period is near the physiological noise, the proposed method can be an alternative solution when the conventional method is not applicable. In passive brain-computer interfaces, estimating the brain signal starting time is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.