ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Machine Learning Techniques for the Performance Enhancement of Multiple Classifiers in the Detection of Cardiovascular Disease from PPG Signals.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid Graph-Machine Learning Framework for Accurate and Interpretable Band Gap Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Multi class photoplethysmography-based deep model for cardiovascular disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
- Advances in cardiovascular signal analysis with future directions: a review of machine learning and deep learning models for cardiovascular disease classification based on ECG, PCG, and PPG signals.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Design and validation of a novel multiple sites signal acquisition and analysis system based on pressure stimulation for human cardiovascular information.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging Classifier Performance Using Heuristic Optimization for Detecting Cardiovascular Disease from PPG Signals.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals are widely used in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool since PPG is noninvasive and inexpensive. In this article, machine learning techniques were used to improve the performance of classifiers for the detection of cardiovascular disease (CVD) from PPG signals. PPG signals occupy a large amount of memory and, hence, the signals were dimensionally reduced in the initial stage. A total of 41 subjects from the Capno database were analyzed in this study, including 20 CVD cases and 21 normal subjects. PPG signals are sampled at 200 samples per second. Therefore, 144,000 samples per patient are available. Now, a one-second-long PPG signal is considered a segment. There are 720 PPG segments per patient. For a total of 41 subjects, 29,520 segments of PPG signals are analyzed in this study. Five dimensionality reduction techniques, such as heuristic- (ABC-PSO, cuckoo clusters, and dragonfly clusters) and transformation-based techniques (Hilbert transform and nonlinear regression) were used in this research. Twelve different classifiers, such as PCA, EM, logistic regression, GMM, BLDC, firefly clusters, harmonic search, detrend fluctuation analysis, PAC Bayesian learning, KNN-PAC Bayesian, softmax discriminant classifier, and detrend with SDC were utilized to detect CVD from dimensionally reduced PPG signals. The performance of the classifiers was assessed based on their metrics, such as accuracy, performance index, error rate, and a good detection rate. The Hilbert transform techniques with the harmonic search classifier outperformed all other classifiers, with an accuracy of 98.31% and a good detection rate of 96.55%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.