ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Additive Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass and Its Polymer Composites as Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: A Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed and Biofabricated Scaffolds for Osteoporotic Bone Defect Repair: Mechanical Adaptation, Redox Control, Senescence Modulation and Osteoimmunomodulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Static Scaffolds to Responsive Implants: 3D-Printed Field-Active Bioceramics for Adaptive Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- NovaBone Bioactive Glass for Oral Bone Regeneration: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Biopolymer-Nanoparticle Interactions in 3D-Printing for Biomedical Applications: Advantages, Limitations and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Bio-Active Composite Therapy (BACT) in Regenerative Orthopaedics.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Bone fusion materials: past, present, and future.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Bioglasses Versus Bioactive Calcium Phosphate Derivatives as Advanced Ceramics in Tissue Engineering: Comparative and Comprehensive Study, Current Trends, and Innovative Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Zinc Doped Synthetic Polymer Composites for Bone Regeneration: A Promising Strategy to Repair Bone Defects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Additive Manufacturing of Binary and Ternary Oxide Systems Using Two-Photon Polymerization and Low-Temperature Sintering.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Special Issue: Bioactive Materials for Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of Si Contents on the Properties of Ti15Mo7ZrxSi Alloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Three-dimensionally printed mesoporous bioactive glass for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration: Material evolution, functional mechanisms, and clinical translation.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioactive glass (BG) and its polymer composites have demonstrated great potential as scaffolds for bone defect healing. Nonetheless, processing these materials into complex geometry to achieve either anatomy-fitting designs or the desired degradation behavior remains challenging. Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of BG and BG/polymer objects with well-defined shapes and intricate porous structures. This work reviewed the recent advancements made in the AM of BG and BG/polymer composite scaffolds intended for bone tissue engineering. A literature search was performed using the Scopus database to include publications relevant to this topic. The properties of BG based on different inorganic glass formers, as well as BG/polymer composites, are first introduced. Melt extrusion, direct ink writing, powder bed fusion, and vat photopolymerization are AM technologies that are compatible with BG or BG/polymer processing and were reviewed in terms of their recent advances. The value of AM in the fabrication of BG or BG/polymer composites lies in its ability to produce scaffolds with patient-specific designs and the on-demand spatial distribution of biomaterials, both contributing to effective bone defect healing, as demonstrated by in vivo studies. Based on the relationships among structure, physiochemical properties, and biological function, AM-fabricated BG or BG/polymer composite scaffolds are valuable for achieving safer and more efficient bone defect healing in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.