Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Muhammad Noman NaseemThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Ali RazaThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-2072
Muhammad KamranThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-8476
Rachel AllavenaThe University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5126-7125
Constantin ConstantinoiuJames Cook University, College of Public Health, Medical & Veterinary Sciences, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia.
Michael McGowanThe University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-4748
Conny TurniThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Ala E TaborThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7147-1078
Peter JamesThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Centre for Animal Science, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1237-0212
The University of Queensland · AUJames Cook University · AU
Funding
Meat & Livestock Australia P.PSH.0798
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
This study investigated the role of cattle immune responses in the pathogenesis of buffalo fly (
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Development of Cutaneous Lesions in Tropically Adapted Beef Cattle Is Associated with Hypersensitive Immune Response to Buffalo Fly Antigens. · full record | OpenQuestion