Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370478›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Predicting Carcass Weight of Grass-Fed Beef Cattle before Slaughter Using Statistical Modelling.

Kalpani Ishara Duwalage, Moe Thandar Wynn, Kerrie Mengersen, Dale Nyholt, Dimitri Perrin, Paul Frederic Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kalpani Ishara DuwalageCentre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-4933
Moe Thandar WynnCentre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Kerrie MengersenCentre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Dale NyholtCentre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-3040
Dimitri PerrinCentre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4000, Australia.
Paul Frederic RobertBlack Box Co., Millstream, Brisbane 4888, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-2476

Funding

Black Box Co Australia 102317090Queensland University of Technology 102317090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaining insights into the utilization of farm-level data for decision-making within the beef industry is vital for improving production and profitability. In this study, we present a statistical model to predict the carcass weight (CW) of grass-fed beef cattle at different stages before slaughter using historical cattle data. Models were developed using two approaches: boosted regression trees and multiple linear regression. A sample of 2995 grass-fed beef cattle from 3 major properties in Northern Australia was used in the modeling. Four timespans prior to the slaughter, i.e., 1 month, 3 months, 9-10 months, and at weaning, were considered in the predictive modelling. Seven predictors, i.e., weaning weight, weight gain since weaning to each stage before slaughter, time since weaning to each stage before slaughter, breed, sex, weaning season (wet and dry), and property, were used as the potential predictors of the CW. To assess the predictive performance in each scenario, a test set which was not used to train the models was utilized. The results showed that the CW of the cattle was strongly associated with the animal's body weight at each stage before slaughter. The results showed that the CW can be predicted with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 4% (~12-16 kg) at three months before slaughter. The predictive error increased gradually when moving away from the slaughter date, e.g., the prediction error at weaning was ~8% (~20-25 kg). The overall predictive performances of the two statistical approaches was approximately similar, and neither of the models substantially outperformed each other. Predicting the CW in advance of slaughter may allow farmers to adequately prepare for forthcoming needs at the farm level, such as changing husbandry practices, control inventory, and estimate price return, thus allowing them to maximize the profitability of the industry.

Indexed as

body weightcarcass weightgrass-fed beef cattlepredictionregressionweaning

Identifiers

PMID37370478
PMCPMC10295273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.