Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370351›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Behavioral Components and Context of Antimicrobial Prescription in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal.

Ana Paula Muniz Almeida-Costa, José-Artur Paiva, António Jorge Santos Almeida, Elisabete Barbosa, Sofia Correia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Antimicrobial stewardship at a tertiary center in Portugal: insights from prescribers.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Paula Muniz Almeida-CostaPublic Health Institute of Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal.
José-Artur PaivaIntensive Care Medicine Service at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João (CHUSJ), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4323-0220
António Jorge Santos AlmeidaMedicine Department at Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-7179
Elisabete BarbosaGeneral Surgery Service at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João (CHUSJ), 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Sofia CorreiaISPUP-EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PTi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTPolytechnic Institute of Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of antimicrobials is an important driver of antimicrobial resistance. There is limited knowledge of the key determinants of antimicrobial prescribing behavior in hospitals. An understanding of these determinants is required for the successful design, adoption, and implementation of quality improvement interventions in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP). This study aimed to describe the main factors that influence the doctor's decision on antimicrobials prescribing and to identify the behaviors that drive physicians' decision making. A structured web-based questionnaire focused on behavioral components of antimicrobial prescription was applied to the medical staff of three different departments-Internal Medicine, General Surgery, and Intensive Care Medicine-of a university hospital. All doctors agreed that inadequate use of antimicrobials increases AMR. A total of 77% of the surgeons and 100% of the internists and intensivists perceived antimicrobial prescription as a priority in the department. Full autonomy in antimicrobial prescription was preferred by internists (64%) but not by surgeons (18%) and intensivists (24%). Most physicians were keen to have ASP advice, but most did not want advice from colleagues of the same service. Almost all surgeons ask for advice when prescribing, but only 68% of the internists do it. Less than half of all physicians and only 25% of the surgeons felt free to prescribe contrary to guidelines. Most physicians, particularly in Intensive Care Medicine (94%), adopt the "wait and see" strategy when no microbiologic confirmation is available, but 27% of the surgeons start empirical therapy. In conclusion, the context of antimicrobial prescription, autonomy, and confidence in antimicrobial prescription demonstrated heterogeneity between the three departments and this should be considered when planning ASP.

Indexed as

antimicrobial prescriptionantimicrobial stewardshipbehaviortheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID37370351
PMCPMC10295435
OpenAlexW4380089848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.