Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370290›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Clinical Practice: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Italy.

Antonio Anastasia, Silvia Bonura, Raffaella Rubino, Giovanni Maurizio Giammanco, Irene Miccichè, Maria Rita Di Pace, Claudia Colomba, Antonio Cascio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Intravenous Fosfomycin for Systemic Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio AnastasiaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Silvia BonuraInfectious and Tropical Disease Unit and Sicilian Regional Reference Center for the Fight against AIDS, AOU Policlinico "P. Giaccone", 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Raffaella RubinoInfectious and Tropical Disease Unit and Sicilian Regional Reference Center for the Fight against AIDS, AOU Policlinico "P. Giaccone", 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni Maurizio GiammancoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-6289
Irene MiccichèAntimicrobial Stewardship Team, AOU Policlinico "P. Giaccone", 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Maria Rita Di PaceDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Claudia ColombaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonio CascioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties "G D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-1796
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fosfomycin in intravenous (IV) formulation has re-emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections because of its broad spectrum of antibacterial action and pharmacokinetic characteristics. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how fosfomycin was used in patients admitted to the Polyclinic of Palermo between January 2017 and July 2022. Clinical indications, therapeutic associations, clinical outcomes, and any side effects were analyzed. Intravenous fosfomycin was used in 343 patients, 63% male, with a mean age of 68 years (range 15-95). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) were the main indications for treatment (19% and 18% of the total cases, respectively), followed by skin and soft tissue infections and sepsis. IV fosfomycin was administered in combination with other antibacterial agents, the most common of which were ceftazidime/avibactam (35%), meropenem (17%), and colistin (14%). Nineteen patients received it as monotherapy for UTIs. About 66% had resolution of the infectious process with clinical remission (cure or discharge). Electrolyte disturbances occurred in 2.6% and gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 2.9%. The data showed that IV fosfomycin is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

Indexed as

antimicrobialsfosfomycingram-negativeretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID37370290
PMCPMC10295113
OpenAlexW4378575858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.