Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370153›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2023

The relationship between homeworking during COVID-19 and both, mental health, and productivity: a systematic review.

Charlotte E Hall, Louise Davidson, Samantha K Brooks, Neil Greenberg, Dale Weston

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Experiences of working from home: umbrella review.Journal of occupational health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Productivity changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated risk factors.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte E HallDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. Charlotte.E.Hall@ukhsa.gov.uk.
Louise DavidsonEvaluation & Translation Directorate, Science Group, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UKHSA, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Samantha K BrooksDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Neil GreenbergDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
Dale WestonEvaluation & Translation Directorate, Science Group, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UKHSA, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit NIHR200890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs of March 2020, the UK public were instructed to work from home where possible and as a result, nearly half of those in employment did so during the following month. Pre-pandemic, around 5% of workers chose to work from home; it was often seen as advantageous, for example due to eliminating commuting time and increasing flexibility. However, homeworking also had negative connotations, for example, blurred boundaries between work and home life due to a sense of constant connectivity to the workplace. Understanding the psychological impact of working from home in an enforced and prolonged manner due to the COVID-19 pandemic is important. Therefore, this review sought to establish the relationship between working from home, mental health, and productivity.

methodsIn January 2022, literature searches were conducted across four electronic databases: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Web of Science. In February 2022 grey literature searches were conducted using Google Advanced Search, NHS Evidence; Gov.uk Publications and the British Library directory of online doctoral theses. Published and unpublished literature which collected data after March 2020, included participants who experienced working from home for at least some of their working hours, and detailed the association in terms of mental health or productivity were included.

resultsIn total 6,906 citations were screened and 25 papers from electronic databases were included. Grey literature searching resulted in two additional papers. Therefore, 27 studies were included in this review. Findings suggest the association between homeworking and both, mental health and productivity varies considerably, suggesting a complex relationship, with many factors (e.g., demographics, occupation) having an influence on the relationship.

conclusionWe found that there was no clear consensus as to the association between working from home and mental health or productivity. However, there are indications that those who start homeworking for the first time during a pandemic are at risk of poor productivity, as are those who experience poor mental health. Suggestions for future research are suggested.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthHumansPandemicsWorkplaceMental healthProductivityResilienceReviewWFHWork from home

Identifiers

PMID37370153
PMCPMC10294311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.