ArticleBMC medical education2023
Investigating the factors influencing students' academic enthusiasm for a shift of paradigm among education managers shaping academic pedagogy.
Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a mobile assisted pedagogical model to enhance academic enthusiasm learning and collaboration in EFL contexts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of fear of intimacy and loneliness in predicting of academic enthusiasm in medical science students: a cross-sectional study from the Iran.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Predicting students' academic performance based on academic identity, academic excitement, and academic enthusiasm: evidence from a cross-sectional study in a developing country.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Psychometric properties of the questionnaire for educational justice assessment-student perspective (QEJA-SP) as a reliable tool to inform managers about students' perceptions.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the quality of safe dental services based on the perception of patients with the IPA approach: a powerful diagnostic tool for managers.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEducation managers are among the most important determinants of a university's academic pedagogy and plans to improve the quality of education. To improve the quality of education and academic enthusiasm of students in a medical university, it might be necessary to improve the university's pedagogy paradigm through people who shape this pedagogy. This study aimed to investigate the factors that influence the academic enthusiasm of students in a medical university with the purpose of improving the university's pedagogy paradigm.
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive-correlational study was conducted on the students of Alborz University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2021-2022 (3180 students). The sample size was calculated to be 343 using Cochran's formula. The participants were recruited by stratified random sampling with respect to the proportion of students in different faculties, disciplines, and education levels. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. Data were analyzed by one-sample t-test and confirmatory factor analysis using SMART-PLS and SPSS26.
resultsThe developed model consisted of 3 dimensions (academic, individual and social), 10 components (teaching-learning environment, culture, extracurricular activities, facilities and equipment, attitude, knowledge, skill, classmate, family, relatives and friends) and 64 indicators.
conclusionThe developed model can help medical universities take a step towards improving the academic productivity and performance of their students and gain a competitive advantage in this respect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.