Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370017›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2023

Giant inguinal hernia repair using standard transverse inguinal incision with mesh. A retrospective case control study.

Jonathan Abraham Demma, Rachel Gefen, Ofek Shpigelman, Alon Pikarsky, Gidon Almogy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lichtenstein repair for giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a retrospective case-control study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan Abraham Demma *Department of General Surgery and Traumatology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Kalman Ya'akov Man St, Jerusalem, Israel. yonatand@hadassah.org.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-127X
Rachel Gefen *Department of General Surgery and Traumatology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Kalman Ya'akov Man St, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ofek ShpigelmanFaculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Alon PikarskyDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Kalman Ya'akov Man St, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gidon AlmogyDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Kalman Ya'akov Man St, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiant inguinal hernia (GIH) is a rare condition in the developed world, and the literature is scarce. Case reports describe different techniques in an attempt to prevent abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). We aimed to review our experience with GIH repair.

methodA retrospective review of the medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent a tension-free mesh GIH repair using a transverse inguinal incision between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary university referral center. In brief, the technique included head-down positioning, maximal pre-incision reduction of hernia contents, and repair with mesh. Follow-up was conducted in outpatient clinic. We compared the results to a time-based open standard inguinal hernia repair group (control group).

resultsDuring the study period, 58 patients underwent an open GIH repair with mesh without abdominal preparation. 232 patients were included in the control group. The mean surgery duration was 125.5 min in the GIH group and 84 min in the control group (p < 0.001). Bowel resection was not necessary in any case. In-hospital complication rates were 13.8% vs. 5.6% in the GIH and control groups, respectively (p = 0.045). Early complication rates (up to 30 days post-operatively) were 62.1% vs. 14.7% in the GIH and control groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Late complications rate was similar (p = 0.476). ACS and mortality were not reported. No recurrence event was reported in the GIH group.

conclusionTension-free mesh repair for GIH using a standard transverse inguinal incision is feasible and safe and there is no need for abdominal cavity preparation. Early complications are more common than in the control group, but there were no higher rate of late or severe complications and no recurrence event.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalCase-Control StudiesGroinHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeAbdominal compartment syndromeGiant inguinal herniaTension-free repair

Identifiers

PMID37370017
PMCPMC10304608
OpenAlexW4382243091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.