Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370013›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Haoshu Zhong, Delong Huang, Junhao Wu, Xiaomin Chen, Yue Chen, Chunlan Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Associations between CT Radiomics Analyses and Hematopoietic Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: An Exploratory Analysis.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haoshu Zhong *Department of Hematology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan, China.
Delong Huang *Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan, China.
Junhao Wu *Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Xiaomin ChenDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan, China.
Yue ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan, China.
Chunlan HuangDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan, China. huangchunlan@swmu.edu.cn.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNHuashan Hospital · CNSouthwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMultiple myeloma (MM), the second most hematological malignancy, have been studied extensively in the prognosis of the clinical parameters, however there are only a few studies have discussed the role of dual modalities and multiple algorithms of

methodsWe extensively explored the predictive ability and clinical decision-making ability of different combination image data of PET, CT, clinical parameters and six machine learning algorithms, Cox proportional hazards model (Cox), linear gradient boosting models based on Cox's partial likelihood (GB-Cox), Cox model by likelihood based boosting (CoxBoost), generalized boosted regression modelling (GBM), random forests for survival model (RFS) and support vector regression for censored data model (SVCR). And the model evaluation methods include Harrell concordance index, time dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsWe finally confirmed 5 PET based features, and 4 CT based features, as well as 6 clinical derived features significantly related to progression free survival (PFS) and we included them in the model construction. In various modalities combinations, RSF and GBM algorithms significantly improved the accuracy and clinical net benefit of predicting prognosis compared with other algorithms. For all combinations of various modalities based models, single-modality PET based prognostic models' performance was outperformed baseline clinical parameters based models, while the performance of models of PET and CT combined with clinical parameters was significantly improved in various algorithms.

conclusion

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Multiple MyelomaAlgorithmsHumansLikelihood FunctionsMachine LearningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F‑FDG PET/CTMachine-learningMultiple myelomaPrognostic predictionRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37370013
PMCPMC10303834
OpenAlexW4382345110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.