Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37370007›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Use of a taxon-specific reference database for accurate metagenomics-based pathogen detection of Listeria monocytogenes in turkey deli meat and spinach.

Jillian Rumore, Matthew Walker, Franco Pagotto, Jessica D Forbes, Christy-Lynn Peterson, Andrea D Tyler, Morag Graham, Gary Van Domselaar, Celine Nadon, Aleisha Reimer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jillian RumoreDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. jillian.rumore@phac-aspc.gc.ca.
Matthew WalkerPublic Health Agency of Canada, National Microbiology Laboratory, MB, Winnipeg, Canada.
Franco PagottoFood Directorate, Health Canada, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jessica D ForbesEastern Ontario Regional Laboratory Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christy-Lynn PetersonPublic Health Agency of Canada, National Microbiology Laboratory, MB, Winnipeg, Canada.
Andrea D TylerPublic Health Agency of Canada, National Microbiology Laboratory, MB, Winnipeg, Canada.
Morag GrahamDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Gary Van DomselaarDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Celine NadonDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Aleisha ReimerPublic Health Agency of Canada, National Microbiology Laboratory, MB, Winnipeg, Canada.
Natalie KnoxDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability of culture-independent pathogen detection in foods using metagenomics is contingent on the quality and composition of the reference database. The inclusion of microbial sequences from a diverse representation of taxonomies in universal reference databases is recommended to maximize classification precision for pathogen detection. However, these sizable databases have high memory requirements that may be out of reach for some users. In this study, we aimed to assess the performance of a foodborne pathogen (FBP)-specific reference database (taxon-specific) relative to a universal reference database (taxon-agnostic). We tested our FBP-specific reference database's performance for detecting Listeria monocytogenes in two complex food matrices-ready-to-eat (RTE) turkey deli meat and prepackaged spinach-using three popular read-based DNA-to-DNA metagenomic classifiers: Centrifuge, Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq.

resultsIn silico host sequence removal led to substantially fewer false positive (FP) classifications and higher classification precision in RTE turkey deli meat datasets using the FBP-specific reference database. No considerable improvement in classification precision was observed following host filtering for prepackaged spinach datasets and was likely a consequence of a higher microbe-to-host sequence ratio. All datasets classified with Centrifuge using the FBP-specific reference database had the lowest classification precision compared to Kraken 2 or KrakenUniq. When a confidence-scoring threshold was applied, a nearly equivalent precision to the universal reference database was achieved for Kraken 2 and KrakenUniq. Recall was high for both reference databases across all datasets and classifiers. Substantially fewer computational resources were required for metagenomics-based detection of L. monocytogenes using the FBP-specific reference database, especially when combined with Kraken 2.

conclusionsA universal (taxon-agnostic) reference database is not essential for accurate and reliable metagenomics-based pathogen detection of L. monocytogenes in complex food matrices. Equivalent classification performance can be achieved using a taxon-specific reference database when the appropriate quality control measures, classification software, and analysis parameters are applied. This approach is less computationally demanding and more attainable for the broader scientific and food safety communities.

Indexed as

Listeria monocytogenesFood MicrobiologyMeatMetagenomicsReproducibility of ResultsSpinacia oleraceaFoodborne outbreakListeria monocytogenesMetagenomics classificationPathogen detectionReference database

Identifiers

PMID37370007
PMCPMC10303765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.