ArticleMolecular diversity2024
Exploring molecular fingerprints of different drugs having bile interaction: a stepping stone towards better drug delivery.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploration of Fingerprints and Data Mining-based Prediction of Some Bioactive Compounds fromCurrent computer-aided drug design · 2025Article
- Identification of structural features of surface modifiers in engineered nanostructured metal oxides regarding cell uptake through ML-based classification.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bile acids are amphiphilic substances produced naturally in humans. In the context of drug delivery and dosage form design, it is critical to understand whether a drug interacts with bile inside the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or not. This study focuses on the identification of structural fingerprints/features important for bile interaction. Molecular modelling methods such as Bayesian classification and recursive partitioning (RP) studies are executed to find important fingerprints/features for the bile interaction. For the Bayesian classification study, the ROC score of 0.837 and 0.950 are found for the training set and the test set compounds, respectively. The fluorine-containing aliphatic/aromatic group, the branched chain of the alkyl group containing hydroxyl moiety and the phenothiazine ring etc. are identified as good fingerprints having a positive contribution towards bile interactions, whereas, the bad fingerprints such as free carboxylate group, purine, and pyrimidine ring etc. have a negative contribution towards bile interactions. The best tree (tree ID: 1) from the RP study classifies the bile interacting or non-interacting compounds with a ROC score of 0.941 for the training and 0.875 for the test set. Additionally, SARpy and QSAR-Co analyses are also been performed to classify compounds as bile interacting/non-interacting. Moreover, forty-six recently FDA-approved drugs have been screened by the developed SARpy and QSAR-Co models to assess their bile interaction properties. Overall, this attempt may facilitate the researchers to identify bile interacting/non-interacting molecules in a faster way and help in the design of formulations and target-specific drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.