ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Advancing the Production of Clinical Medical Devices Through ChatGPT.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health system-wide access to generative artificial intelligence: the New York University Langone Health experience.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- ChatGPT in pharmacy practice: a cross-sectional exploration of Jordanian pharmacists' perception, practice, and concerns.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a recently popular large language model, Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is highly valued in the field of clinical medicine. Due to the limited understanding of the potential impact of ChatGPT on the manufacturing side of clinical medical devices, we aim to fill this gap through this article. We elucidate the classification of medical devices and explore the positive contributions of ChatGPT in various aspects of medical device design, optimization, and improvement. However, limitations such as the potential for misinterpretation of user intent, lack of personal experience, and the need for human supervision should be taken into consideration. Striking a balance between ChatGPT and human expertise can ensure the safety, quality, and compliance of medical devices. This work contributes to the advancement of ChatGPT in the medical device manufacturing industry and highlights the synergistic relationship between artificial intelligence and human involvement in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37369944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.