Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369921›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Deep learning approach for differentiating indeterminate adrenal masses using CT imaging.

Yashbir Singh, Zachary S Kelm, Shahriar Faghani, Dana Erickson, Tal Yalon, Irina Bancos, Bradley J Erickson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yashbir SinghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Zachary S KelmDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shahriar FaghaniDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Dana EricksonDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tal YalonDepartment of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Irina BancosDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bradley J EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. bje@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDistinguishing stage 1-2 adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and large, lipid poor adrenal adenoma (LPAA) via imaging is challenging due to overlapping imaging characteristics. This study investigated the ability of deep learning to distinguish ACC and LPAA on single time-point CT images.

methodsRetrospective cohort study from 1994 to 2022. Imaging studies of patients with adrenal masses who had available adequate CT studies and histology as the reference standard by method of adrenal biopsy and/or adrenalectomy were included as well as four patients with LPAA determined by stability or regression on follow-up imaging. Forty-eight (48) subjects with pathology-proven, stage 1-2 ACC and 43 subjects with adrenal adenoma >3 cm in size demonstrating a mean non-contrast CT attenuation > 20 Hounsfield Units centrally were included. We used annotated single time-point contrast-enhanced CT images of these adrenal masses as input to a 3D Densenet121 model for classifying as ACC or LPAA with five-fold cross-validation. For each fold, two checkpoints were reported, highest accuracy with highest sensitivity (accuracy focused) and highest sensitivity with the highest accuracy (sensitivity focused).

resultsWe trained a deep learning model (3D Densenet121) to predict ACC versus LPAA. The sensitivity-focused model achieved mean accuracy: 87.2% and mean sensitivity: 100%. The accuracy-focused model achieved mean accuracy: 91% and mean sensitivity: 96%.

conclusionDeep learning demonstrates promising results distinguishing between ACC and large LPAA using single time-point CT images. Before being widely adopted in clinical practice, multicentric and external validation are needed.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdrenal Cortex NeoplasmsAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdrenocortical AdenomaAdrenocortical CarcinomaDeep LearningHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdrenocortical carcinomaComputed tomographyDeep learningLipid poor adrenal adenoma

Identifiers

PMID37369921
OpenAlexW4382199074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.