ArticleDie Anaesthesiologie2023
[Preclinical patient transport at the end of life].
Article in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough most people would like to die at home, many die in hospitals. The study shows physicians' and paramedics' experiences with prehospital care of patients at the end of life.
methodUsing an anonymous online questionnaire, primary care physicians and ambulance personnel in the Frankfurt am Main metropolitan area were surveyed about their experiences with end of life care.
resultsA total of 63 primary care physicians (PCP) and 62 emergency medical service staff (EMS) answered the questionnaire (female 31.2%, male 68.8%). Of the respondents 65.8% reported that patients are often still transported to hospital at the end of life. Of the participants 17.9% felt confident in their assessment of a patient at the end of life, 33.3% of PCP and 8.5% of EMS felt confident about subsequent treatment and 91.9% of PCP and 96.2% of EMS reported that they always/often ask about an advance healthcare directive. Of the participants 98.3% felt that EMS rarely/never ask about advance care planning, 78.7% of all participants would rarely/never ask about it and 90.4% of EMS would like to have a legally secure emergency document to guide their actions.
conclusionTransporting patients at the end of life is part of everyday prehospital practice. There are uncertainties in the assessment and care of these patients. In the future, rescue service and medical training should include specific palliative care strategies. Advance healthcare directive and advance care planning must be more widely recognized by the medical community, so that in emergency situations the desired corridors of action in the best interests of the patient are quickly made known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37369813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.