Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369746›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Machine learning-based somatic variant calling in cell-free DNA of metastatic breast cancer patients using large NGS panels.

Elisabeth M Jongbloed, Maurice P H M Jansen, Vanja de Weerd, Jean A Helmijr, Corine M Beaufort, Marcel J T Reinders, Ronald van Marion, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Gabe S Sonke, Inge R Konings and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth M JongbloedDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maurice P H M JansenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vanja de WeerdDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jean A HelmijrDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Corine M BeaufortDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel J T ReindersDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ronald van MarionDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilfred F J van IJckenErasmus Center for Biomics, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inge R KoningsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John W M MartensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia M Wilting *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stavros Makrodimitris *Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.makrodimitris@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDelft University of Technology · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2018NovPCC100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising method for treatment monitoring and therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, distinguishing tumor-specific variants from sequencing artefacts and germline variation with low false discovery rate is challenging when using large targeted sequencing panels covering many tumor suppressor genes. To address this, we built a machine learning model to remove false positive variant calls and augmented it with additional filters to ensure selection of tumor-derived variants. We used cfDNA of 70 MBC patients profiled with both the small targeted Oncomine breast panel (Thermofisher) and the much larger Qiaseq Human Breast Cancer Panel (Qiagen). The model was trained on the panels' common regions using Oncomine hotspot mutations as ground truth. Applied to Qiaseq data, it achieved 35% sensitivity and 36% precision, outperforming basic filtering. For 20 patients we used germline DNA to filter for somatic variants and obtained 245 variants in total, while our model found seven variants, of which six were also detected using the germline strategy. In ten tumor-free individuals, our method detected in total one (potentially germline) variant, in contrast to 521 variants detected without our model. These results indicate that our model largely detects somatic variants.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsBreastFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningMutationCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID37369746
PMCPMC10300101
OpenAlexW4382196084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.