ArticleScientific reports2023
The dynamic functional connectivity fingerprint of high-grade gliomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of abnormal neural language networks by reading "brainprints" in patients with brain tumors.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Disrupted dynamics of transient brain states in patients with brain tumors: a co-activation pattern analysis of resting-state fMRI.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Resting-State vs. Task-Based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurosurgical Planning: A Narrative Review of Clinical Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- BOLD complexity characterizes glioblastoma survival via voxel-wise and localized sample entropy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Structural-functional fingerprinting for abnormalities investigation in glioma patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Different Brain Network Connectomic Relationships Subserve Hand Dexterity During Task Versus Resting States in People with Brain Tumors.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Brain state theory as a comprehensive model for addressing the "non-eloquent" brain in glioma surgery.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting attention deficits and functional recovery after glioma resection through functional executive networks: insights from dynamic properties.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Assessing regional homogeneity and cognitive function alterations in pediatric brain tumor patients: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resting state fMRI has been used in many studies to investigate the impact of brain tumours on functional connectivity (FC). However, these studies have so far assumed that FC is stationary, disregarding the fact that the brain fluctuates over dynamic states. Here we utilised resting state fMRI data from 33 patients with high-grade gliomas and 33 healthy controls to examine the dynamic interplay between resting-state networks and to gain insights into the impact of brain tumours on functional dynamics. By employing Hidden Markov Models, we demonstrated that functional dynamics persist even in the presence of a high-grade glioma, and that patients exhibited a global decrease of connections strength, as well as of network segregation. Furthermore, through a multivariate analysis, we demonstrated that patients' cognitive scores are highly predictive of pathological dynamics, thus supporting our hypothesis that functional dynamics could serve as valuable biomarkers for better understanding the traits of high-grade gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.