ArticleScientific reports2023
SSN2V: unsupervised OCT denoising using speckle split.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust image quality evaluation in optical coherence tomography of skin using global, region-independent metrics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using Principal Components Analysis to Visualize Motion and Mitigate Artifacts in Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Self-supervised model-informed deep learning for low-SNR SS-OCT domain transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision measurement of stratum corneum thickness in OCT images using variational autoencoders and advanced DSP techniques.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Denoising in optical coherence tomography (OCT) is important to compensate the low signal-to-noise ratio originating from laser speckle. In recent years learning algorithms have been established as the most powerful denoising approach. Especially unsupervised denoising is an interesting topic since it is not possible to acquire noise free scans with OCT. However, speckle in in-vivo OCT images contains not only noise but also information about blood flow. Existing OCT denoising algorithms treat all speckle equally and do not distinguish between the noise component and the flow information component of speckle. Consequently they either tend to either remove all speckle or denoise insufficiently. Unsupervised denoising methods tend to remove all speckle but create results that have a blurry impression which is not desired in a clinical application. To this end we propose the concept, that an OCT denoising method should, besides reducing uninformative noise, additionally preserve the flow-related speckle information. In this work, we present a fully unsupervised algorithm for single-frame OCT denoising (SSN2V) that fulfills these goals by incorporating known operators into our network. This additional constraint greatly improves the denoising capability compared to a network without. Quantitative and qualitative results show that the proposed method can effectively reduce the speckle noise in OCT B-scans of the human retina while maintaining a sharp impression outperforming the compared methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.