ArticleMolecular pain
Saltatory conduction and intrinsic electrophysiological properties at the nodes of ranvier of Aα/β-afferent fibers and Aα-efferent fibers in rat sciatic nerves.
Article in Molecular pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Large-diameter myelinated fibers in sciatic nerves are composed of both Aα/β-afferent fibers and Aα-efferent fibers to convey sensory and motor impulses, respectively, via saltatory conduction for rapid leg responses. Saltatory conduction and electrophysiological properties at the nodes of Ranvier (NRs) of these sciatic nerve fibers have not been directly studied. We used ex vivo sciatic nerve preparations from rats and applied patch-clamp recordings at the NRs of both Aα/β-afferent fibers and Aα-efferent fibers in the sciatic nerves to characterize their saltatory conduction and intrinsic electrophysiological properties. The velocity and frequency of saltatory conduction in both types of fibers were similar. Resting membrane potentials (RMPs), input resistance, action potential (AP) threshold, and AP rheobase were also not significantly different at the NRs of the two types of fibers in the sciatic nerves. In comparison with Aα/β-afferent fibers, Aα-efferent fibers in the sciatic nerves show higher amplitude and broader width of APs at their NRs. At the NRs of both types of fibers, depolarizing voltages evoked transient inward currents followed by non-inactivating outward currents, and the inward currents and non-inactivating outward currents at the NRs were not significantly different between the two types of fibers. Using AP-clamp, inward currents during AP upstroke were found to be insignificant difference, but amplitudes of non-inactivating outward currents during AP repolarization were significantly lower at the NRs of Aα-efferent fibers than at the NRs of Aα/β-afferent fibers in the sciatic nerves. Collectively, saltatory conduction, ionic currents, and intrinsic electrophysiological properties at the NRs of Aα/β-afferent fibers and Aα-efferent fibers in the sciatic nerves are generally similar, but some differences were also observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.