Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369674›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Stakeholder integration predicts better outcomes from groundwater sustainability policy.

Debra Perrone, Melissa M Rohde, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Rebecca Anderson, Samantha Arthur, Ngodoo Atume, Meagan Brown, Lauren Esaki-Kua, Martha Gonzalez Fernandez, Kelly A Garvey and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Debra Perrone *Environmental Studies, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. perrone@ucsb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4268-8478
Melissa M Rohde *California Water Program, The Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, CA, USA. melissa@rohdeenvironmental.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-0711
Courtney Hammond Wagner *USDA Agricultural Research Service, Food Systems Research Unit, Burlington, VT, USA. courtney.hammond-wagner@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-789X
Rebecca AndersonIndependent Consultant, Portland, OR, USA.
Samantha ArthurAudubon California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Ngodoo AtumeClean Water Action, Oakland, CA, USA.
Meagan BrownBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Lauren Esaki-KuaWater in the West, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Martha Gonzalez FernandezEnvironmental Studies, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Kelly A GarveyWater in the West, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Katherine HeidelTetra Tech, Lafayette, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-6381
William D JonesEnvironmental Studies, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Sara Khosrowshahi AslWater in the West, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Carrie MunillTetra Tech, Lafayette, CA, USA.
Rebecca NelsonMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Pablo Ortiz-PartidaUnion of Concerned Scientists, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-2607
E J RemsonCalifornia Water Program, The Nature Conservancy, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural resources policies that promote sustainable management are critical for protecting diverse stakeholders against depletion. Although integrating diverse stakeholders into these policies has been theorized to improve protection, empirical evidence is lacking. Here, we evaluate 108 Sustainability Plans under California's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act to quantify how well stakeholders are integrated into plans and protected from groundwater depletion. We find that the majority of Sustainability Plans do not integrate or protect the majority of their stakeholders. Nevertheless, our results show that when stakeholders are more integrated into a Sustainability Plan, they are more likely to be protected, particularly for those that lack formal access to decision-making processes. Our findings provide strong empirical evidence that integrating diverse stakeholders into sustainability planning is beneficial for stakeholders who are vulnerable to the impacts of natural resource depletion.

Identifiers

PMID37369674
PMCPMC10300030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.