Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369587›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Mouse Behavior on the Trial-Unique Nonmatching-to-Location (TUNL) Touchscreen Task Reflects a Mixture of Distinct Working Memory Codes and Response Biases.

Daniel Bennett, Jay Nakamura, Chitra Vinnakota, Elysia Sokolenko, Jess Nithianantharajah, Maarten van den Buuse, Nigel C Jones, Suresh Sundram, Rachel Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of NMDA receptor antagonists on working memory and gamma oscillations, and the mediating role of the GluN2D subunit.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel BennettSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3180, Australia daniel.bennett@monash.edu rachel.hill@monash.edu.
Jay NakamuraDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3180, Australia.
Chitra VinnakotaDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3180, Australia.
Elysia SokolenkoDiscipline of Anatomy and Pathology, School of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
Jess NithianantharajahFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Maarten van den BuuseSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia.
Nigel C JonesDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Suresh SundramDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3180, Australia.
Rachel HillDepartment of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3180, Australia daniel.bennett@monash.edu rachel.hill@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trial-unique nonmatching to location (TUNL) touchscreen task shows promise as a translational assay of working memory (WM) deficits in rodent models of autism, ADHD, and schizophrenia. However, the low-level neurocognitive processes that drive behavior in the TUNL task have not been fully elucidated. In particular, it is commonly assumed that the TUNL task predominantly measures spatial WM dependent on hippocampal pattern separation, but this proposition has not previously been tested. In this project, we tested this question using computational modeling of behavior from male and female mice performing the TUNL task (

Indexed as

HippocampusMemory, Short-TermAnimalsBiasFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiceProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiescomputational modelinghippocampusprospective working memoryretrospective working memoryTUNLworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37369587
PMCPMC10401633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.