Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369483›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Volume Index Measured Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Cervical Cancer Tumors <2 cm.

Ken Imai, Kenro Chikazawa, Tomoyuki Kuwata, Ryo Konno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken ImaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, The Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Kenro ChikazawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, The Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan kendokenro@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8839-4483
Tomoyuki KuwataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, The Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Ryo KonnoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical Center, The Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimDiagnosis of cervical cancer with tumor diameter <2 cm using magnetic resonance imaging alone has not been investigated. Moreover, whether tumor volume can be used for diagnosing the true tumor diameter remains unknown. Here, we investigated the utility of early cervical cancer volume index in diagnosing cervical cancer with a tumor diameter of <2 cm, which can be treated using more conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis single-center retrospective study analyzed women who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with a tumor diameter of <2 cm and clinical stages IA2, IB1, IB2, IB3, and IIA1 at our institute between January 2009 and April 2022. The volume index, defined as the product of the maximum longitudinal diameter along the uterine axis, maximum anteroposterior diameter (thickness) on a sagittal section image, and maximum horizontal diameter on a horizontal section image, was evaluated using either T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. The receiver operating characteristic curve for the volume index was also calculated.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring the tumor diameter were 0.92 and 0.84, respectively. The calculated cut-off value was 2.60, whereas the volume index area under the curve was 0.955, with a sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.93.

conclusionConsidering the specificity and low incidence of false-negative results, the volume index can be used for preoperative diagnosis of pT1B1 cervical cancer, which can be treated with more conservative surgery.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCervical cancerconservative surgerydiagnosismagnetic resonance imagingvolume index

Identifiers

PMID37369483
PMCPMC10347931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.