Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of point-of-care lung ultrasonography in a tertiary centre in Benin: a qualitative study among general physicians and pneumologists.

Veronique Suttels, Sofia Guedes Da Costa, Elena Garcia, Thomas Brahier, Mary-Anne Hartley, Gildas Agodokpessi, Prudence Wachinou, Fabienne Fasseur, Noémie Boillat-Blanco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronique Suttels *Infectious Diseases, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland veronique.suttels@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5261-0439
Sofia Guedes Da Costa *Research Center for Psychology of Health, Aging and Sport Examination (PHASE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elena GarciaEmergency Department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas BrahierInfectious Diseases, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary-Anne HartleyDigital Global Health Department, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gildas AgodokpessiNational Hospital Center of Pneumology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Prudence WachinouNational Hospital Center of Pneumology, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin.
Fabienne Fasseur *Research Center for Psychology of Health, Aging and Sport Examination (PHASE), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Noémie Boillat-Blanco *Infectious Diseases, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOwing to its ease-of-use and excellent diagnostic performance for the assessment of respiratory symptoms, point-of-care lung ultrasound (POC-LUS) has emerged as an attractive skill in resource-low settings, where limited access to specialist care and inconsistent radiology services erode health equity.To narrow down the research to practice gap, this study aims to gain in-depth insights in the perceptions on POC-LUS and computer-assisted POC-LUS for the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in a low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) of sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study using face-to-face semi-structured interviews with three pneumologists and five general physicians in a tertiary centre for pneumology and tuberculosis in Benin, West Africa. The center hosts a prospective cohort study on the diagnostic performance of POC-LUS for LRTI. In this context, all participants started a POC-LUS training programme 6 months before the current study. Transcripts were coded by the interviewer, checked for intercoder reliability by an independent psychologist, compared and thematically summarised according to grounded theory methods.

resultsVarious barriers- and facilitators+ to POC-LUS implementation were identified related to four principal categories: (1) hospital setting (eg, lack of resources for device renewal or maintenance-, need for POC tests+), (2) physician's perceptions (eg, lack of opportunity to practice-, willingness to appropriate the technique+), (3) tool characteristics (eg, unclear lifespan-, expedited diagnosis+) and (4) patient's experience (no analogous image to keep-, reduction in costs+). Furthermore, all interviewees had positive attitudes towards computer-assisted POC-LUS.

conclusionsThere is a clear need for POC affordable lung imaging techniques in LMIC and physicians are willing to implement POC-LUS to optimise the diagnostic approach of LRTI with an affordable tool. Successful integration of POC-LUS into clinical routine will require adequate responses to local challenges related to the lack of available maintenance resources and limited opportunity to supervised practice for physicians.

Indexed as

General PractitionersRespiratory Tract InfectionsBeninHumansLungPoint-of-Care SystemsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyQualitative ResearchTropical medicineUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37369423
PMCPMC10357755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.