Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37369421›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Applying an osteopathic intervention to improve mild to moderate mental health symptoms: a mixed-methods feasibility study protocol.

Josh Hope-Bell, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Darren J Edwards

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05674071 (Applying an Osteopathic Intervention to Improve Mild to Moderate Mental Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05674071 nacompletednot on this map

Applying an Osteopathic Intervention to Improve Mild to Moderate Mental Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwansea UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsMental Health IssueArmsArticulation/HVT, Soft-tissue massage, Craniosacral techniques, Combination of the three interventions: HVT, soft-tissue and craniosacral techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josh Hope-BellDepartment of Public Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Jerry Draper-RodiUniversity College of Osteopathy, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1900-6141
Darren J EdwardsDepartment of Public Health, Swansea University, Swansea, UK D.J.Edwards@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2143-1198
Swansea University · GBUniversity College of Osteopathy · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental health services are stretched in the UK and are in need of support. One approach that could improve mental health symptoms is osteopathy. Research suggests that osteopathy influences psychophysiological factors, which could lead to improvements in mental health. The first objective of this protocol is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of four osteopathic interventions. A secondary aim is to evaluate the interventions' effectiveness for improving psychophysiological and mental health outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be an explanatory mixed-methods design. Participants will be 30 adults who have mild to moderate mental health symptoms and not experiencing any issues with pain. The feasibility and acceptability of the interventions will be the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will be physiological measures including heart rate variability, interoceptive accuracy and blood pressure. Psychological outcomes, collected preintervention and postintervention, will also be measured by five standardised questionnaires, which include: (1) the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS); (2) the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Short-Form; (3) Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II; (4) the Self as Context Scale and (5) and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Version 2. Participants will be randomised to one of four intervention groups and receive a single intervention treatment session. These intervention groups are: (1) high-velocity and articulation techniques, (2) soft-tissue massage, (3) craniosacral techniques, and (4) a combination of these three approaches. Mixed design two (preintervention and postintervention) by the four interventions analysis of covariance models will be used to analyse the quantitative data for each quantitative measure. Participants will also be interviewed about their experiences of the study and interventions and a thematic analysis will be used to analyse this qualitative data. This will aid the assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of the study design. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol for this feasibility study has received ethical approval from the Department of Psychology Ethics Committee at Swansea University, ethical review reference number: 2022-5603-4810. Feasibility results from this protocol will be published in a peer review journal and presented at both national and international conferences. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting osteopathic interventions for improving mental health outcomes. The results from this will help to inform the development of a future randomised controlled trial. The study will also produce original data which could provide preliminary evidence of whether osteopathic approaches are of benefit to individual's mental health in the form of effect sizes, even if they are pain-free. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05674071.

Indexed as

DepressionMental HealthAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersFeasibility StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnxiety disordersDepression & mood disordersMENTAL HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37369421
PMCPMC10410888
OpenAlexW4382344205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.